SaaS applications level the information sharing field
From the business world to government and public safety, hosted software solutions are changing the paradigm for how software is purchased and used. Hosted software solutions, otherwise known as Software as a Service (SaaS), offer a level of flexibility and economy with
|
SaaS applications render installation time, costs and learning curves obsolete because the vendor that hosts the software application is responsible for maintaining and updating the system.
|
which commercially licensed, internally operated software systems can’t compete.
SaaS is a software application delivery model where a vendor develops a Web-native application and hosts and operates (either independently or through a third party) the application for use by its customers over the Internet. Customers pay not for owning the software itself but for using it.
The main benefit here is that while internally operated software requires a huge initial investment for installation and usually involves a level of complexity which demands extensive IT support, SaaS models allow the user to pay as they go without any of the hassles associated with installation or maintenance. All the user needs is Web access to have a range of sophisticated technologies at his fingertips.
While many of the original SaaS applications were basic office tools (i.e. accounting and document sharing programs), today’s
generation of SaaS applications offer a range
of sophisticated enterprise tools that allow for
an unprecedented level of data capture, management
and sharing.
SaaS applications offer a solution to many of the hang-ups associated with the implementation of IT systems for public sector entities. Government agencies are much more conservative when it comes to making IT purchasing decisions and are notoriously slow when it comes to installation and implementation of new technologies. It is an ironic truth that a recurring theme within the public sector is that by the time a “new” technology is implemented and staff brought up to speed, the system has already become a legacy model - and a new generation of technologies with more sophisticated features are already available on the market.
SaaS applications render installation
time, costs and learning curves obsolete
because the third-party vendor that hosts
the software application is responsible for
maintaining and updating the system. All
the end-user needs in order to take full
advantage of application features is an
Internet connection and browser — no
installation process, associated fees, or
upkeep are required.
Furthermore, the flexibility and
ease-of-use of SaaS applications are
what made the model attractive to the
business community in the first place.
Many SaaS vendors design products
to be easy to use, minimizing the
learning curve for even the most
complex of programs.
Fusion centers and
SaaS applications
The National Information Management System (NIMS) specifies a set of processes, protocols and procedures that all first responders must use to coordinate and conduct response actions. This has fostered the birth of fusion centers
|
Benefits of SaaS applications
- No additional hardware is needed
- Low start-up costs
- Add users as you go, when you need them
- Affordable monthly payment to better manage cash flow
- Print reports that look like your paper reports
- Easy to set up report bundling capability
|
designed to maximize interoperability and information sharing between emergency professionals at all levels. The architecture and infrastructure of fusion centers is much like that of SaaS applications: fusion centers include a third-party/ remote server that houses and coordinates the flow of information from various law enforcement agencies within a given network.
The principal role of
fusion centers is to compile,
analyze and disseminate
criminal and terrorist information
and intelligence. By
aggregating information
from disparate databases
and records systems, fusion
centers create a single view
of information that can be
used for crime trend analysis
or for centralized control of
dispatch in crisis scenarios.
A major obstacle impeding
data aggregation at
fusion centers is disparate
record-keeping methodologies
for agencies within a
given information sharing
network. Often times, each
agency has its own method
for tracking and storing
incident reports, making it
difficult for fusion center
staff to coordinate and consolidate
information coming
from various sources.
Furthermore, differences in resources
possessed by large and small agencies
create a situation where not all law
enforcement departments possess the
infrastructure necessary to meet federal
standards for information sharing.
While larger agencies have much more
sophisticated IT departments, smaller
and mid-sized agencies may not have the
capital and human resources to maintain
the IT infrastructure necessary to comply
with information sharing standards. The
end result is that while major metropolitan
police forces may be effectively
contributing to the mission objectives of
fusion centers, smaller agencies may still
use dated methods to file incident reports,
resulting in large gaps in the information
consolidated at local fusion centers.
The adoption of SaaS applications by
law enforcement has huge potential benefits
for small- and medium-sized agencies.
Not only do existing SaaS applications
offer agencies with limited budgets sophisticated
and affordable field-reporting solutions,
but they aid inter-agency information
sharing efforts by creating a standard for
the information flow within the network.
Furthermore, SaaS vendors can make sure
their solutions comply with standards set
by local fusion centers to maximize compatibility
and information exchange.
Closing the gap
The National Incident Exchange
Model (NIEM), formed through
a partnership between the U.S.
Department of Justice and the federal
Department of Homeland Security,
was created to facilitate the development
of enterprise-wide information
exchange standards which can be
uniformly developed, centrally maintained,
quickly identified and discovered,
and efficiently reused. Since the
implementation of NIEM, there have
been a score of technology vendors
offering products that claim to help
law enforcement come up to speed
with NIEM standards.
However, the majority of these
products have been designed for
departments with large budgets
capable of meeting the financial and
human capital requirements associated
with the installation of complex datamanagement
systems. Additionally, the
first generation of these technologies,
which many law enforcement agencies
are now just beginning to grasp, have
become dated by new and improved
next-generation systems that require
further infrastructure to manage.
The result is that large agencies
clamor to stay up to speed on the most
recent versions of software to ensure
compatibility with federal information
sharing standards and the growing technological
disparity between the largest
law enforcement agencies and smaller
community-based police departments.
This disparity inhibits intelligence analysts’
ability to see the “whole picture”
in terms of recognizing how terrorist
and criminal networks operate across
geographic expanses.
The inability of community police
departments to acquire the technologies
necessary to effectively share information
not only impedes their ability
to perform their primary job function,
but the resulting intelligence gaps pose
a threat to national security.
This is especially true considering
the ability of terrorist and criminal
networks to capitalize on recent
advances in communications technology
and transportation to carry out
operations over large geographical
areas. In fact, criminal networks are
highly aware of the limitations of
information sharing capabilities of
smaller police departments, and they
exploit this vulnerability to carry out a
range of illicit activities.
The benefits of SaaS for
law enforcement
SaaS applications have a great deal
of potential to address the needs of
small community police departments
to ensure they are able to participate
in information sharing networks with
other law enforcement agencies.
As opposed to the large initial capital
investment needed to install internally
operated software systems, most SaaS
applications require a monthly service fee
that is much more affordable considering
the limited budgets of smaller departments.
Additionally, SaaS application service
providers are responsible for content
management and software updates, and
possess the resources to ensure data is
housed in a form compliant with federal
standards specified under NIEM and that
users have access to the most up-to-date
software applications.
That SaaS service providers provide
the majority of IT support for their
applications is crucial for the aims
of small- and mid-sized community
law enforcement agencies. A recent
study conducted by Law Enforcement
Technology surveyed a cross-section
of law enforcement officers from both
large and small agencies. It found that
45 percent did not have the resources
for full-time IT support within the
agency. (See Figure 1A.)
Additionally, 94 percent of respondents
said they would be willing to
adopt technologies that allow them
to share information with other law
enforcement agencies at the state and
federal level. (See Figure 1B.)
These findings demonstrate that law
enforcement personnel are willing to
adopt technologies that allow them to
better share information. However, many
agencies do not have the resources or
human capital to implement software
systems that would allow them to do so.
Recognizing the demand by a large
portion of the law enforcement community
for affordable, manageable
technology solutions, the private sector
has responded with a range of hosted
software applications that comply with
federal standards and are field-tested
and ready for use.
| SaaS application service providers possess the resources to ensure data is housed in a form compliant with federal standards specified under NIEM.
|
For example, BlueStreak Connect,
headquartered in Denver, Colorado,
recently released a SaaS-based mobile
field reporting solution that provides
dynamic e-forms incident reporting
solutions for police officers on patrol.
The solution streamlines incident
reporting by providing a universal
form accessible through mobile PCs
installed in patrol vehicles. The technology
walks the officer through a
logical series of questions to gather
the critical incident information, maps
the data to the required reports, and
packages the reports for delivery and
approval by the officer’s supervisor.
Furthermore, the information is
relayed back to the agency database
and housed in BlueStreak’s servers in a
form compatible with NIEM standards.
In effect, BlueStreak is responsible
for providing the software, collecting
information and ensuring the information
collected is compatible with federal
guidelines for information sharing.
According to another survey
conducted by Law Enforcement
Technology, there is a significant
demand for technologies that automate
basic reporting processes for law
enforcement agencies as reflected in
the fact that 86 percent of law enforcement
personnel surveyed spend two
to three hours a day writing and filing
reports, with 36 percent spending more
than three hours a day on this process.
(See Figure 2A.)
Paul Smith, president of BlueStreak Connect, says his company’s ConnectSuite was designed with the needs of small- and mid-sized law enforcement agencies in mind. "We realize that the role of smaller community police departments is crucial in the effort to combat criminal and terrorist networks," he says, "and we want to provide them with the best tools available to carry out their mission objective.
"Our product model was designed to ensure that every officer has the best technologies at his disposal to protect the public," he explains, "and we see SaaS software applications as playing a huge role in the future of law enforcement. The way we look at it, police officers should be able to focus on protecting the public, and should not be distracted with logistical concerns associated with IT. That is our job."
The future of SaaS
|
SaaS applications
for information
sharing
- Questionnaire-driven data collection
- Pay by the user
- No software to install
- Offline capability
- Prepopulation with user-defined routing
- GJXDM and NIEM compliant
- Incident Activity Dashboard
|
Many law enforcement information
sharing networks already exist
with architectures that resemble SaaS
models by incorporating third-party
servers to coordinate the flow of information,
such as:
- National Crime Information Center (NCIC)
- International Justice and Public Safety Information Sharing Network
- Automated Fingerprint Identity System (AFIS)
- Law Enforcement National Data Exchange Initiative (N-DEx)
As agencies come up to speed with new technologies and mandates for information sharing among first responders, there will be greater prevalence of remote data systems coordinating the flow of information between agencies. The progression toward third-party systems controlling the flow of information is a natural one considering the number of idiosyncratic records management systems at the local, state and federal level that must be synchronized to have effective intra-agency communications.
Dennis Duval retired as chief of police
in Syracuse, New York, in 2004 after 27
years of law enforcement service. Prior
to being appointed chief, he served in
many positions including detective, patrol
shift supervisor, deputy chief and SWAT
team commander. During his time as
chief, Duval drove the formation of the
Central New York Information Sharing
Project. Nationally recognized, the project
has been spotlighted and further funded
by the State of New York and U.S.
Departments of Justice and Homeland
Security as a model for information sharing
and inter-jurisdictional cooperation.
Reprinted with permission from Law Enforcement Technology magazine
January 2008 BlueStreak Connect • 12801 Worldgate Drive • Suite #513 • Herndon, VA 20170 571-203-7268 •
|